她激进的言行,也体现在出行方式上。为了减少碳排放,Greta选择坐零碳排放的帆船去美国,而不是飞机。
Via APThunberg arrived in the US in August, after sailing for weeks from England。 In New York she addressed the UN on the climate crisis, calling out governments for betraying young people。
Thunberg从英国坐帆船航行了数周后,于8月到达美国。在纽约,她就气候危机在联合国发表讲话,指责各国领导人出卖年轻人的未来。
就在人们质疑她打算怎么回欧洲的时候,最新消息是Greta称将参加在马德里举行的联合国气候变化大会,还是坐船去。
Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg plans to set sail from Virginia for Spain Wednesday after the venue for United Nations-sponsored climate talks were moved from Chile due to political unrest。
瑞典气候活动人士Greta Thunberg计划于周三从弗吉尼亚起航前往西班牙,此前由于政治动荡,联合国气候大会的地点从智利被迁到西班牙。
Thunberg will set sail for Europe immediately on a 48-foot catamaran with Australian vloggers Riley Whitlum and Elayna Carausu and Englishwoman Nikki Henderson – who is a professional yachtswoman。
Thunberg 将立即与澳大利亚视频博主 Riley Whitlum 和 Elayna Carausu 以及专业的游艇运动员英国人Nikki Henderson一起乘坐48英尺的双体船前往欧洲。
The boat leaves little to no carbon footprint, boasting solar panels and a hydro-generators for power。 It also has a toilet, unlike the boat on which she sailed from the United Kingdom to New York in August, which only had a bucket。
该船几乎没有碳排放,靠太阳能电池板和水力发电机发电。船上也有厕所,与她8月从英国航行到纽约的船不同,这艘船只有一个厕所。
The trip should take around three weeks。
此行程大约需要三个星期。
Via The Guardian
Greta 说她不坐飞机,是因为飞机的出行方式不环保。但是这个说法,却遭到了很多网友的质疑:
Does this young girl ever attend school? Seems a bit odd。
这个小女孩不要上学吗?似乎有点奇怪。
fyi。“Greta Thunberg sets sail for New York on zero-carbon yacht made of carbon fiber”。except。“Carbon fiber takes approximately 14 times more energy to produce than steel。 And nearly impossible to recycle carbon fiber。 Steel is regularly and easily recycled”。
科普一下“ Greta Thunberg 乘坐碳纤维制成的零碳游艇启程前往纽约” 。。。只是。。。“生产碳纤维需要的能源大约是钢的14倍,而且几乎无法回收。钢铁反而且容易回收”。
“zero carbon”, you‘re funny。 More crew members flying in jets between Europe and USA to sail the yacht back to Europe than if only Greta and her father had flown there。 A miserable PR stunt that even Reuters falls for? Shame on you。
“零碳”,怎么可能呢。原来只要Greta和她的父亲两个人坐飞机,现在负责来回运送游艇的一拨人都要坐飞机。完全是个噱头,连路透社都信这个噱头?太无耻了。
到底是环保天使,还是环保“骗子”,你怎么看?